Across the Pacific, “resilience” now appears in climate plans, policy statements, disaster reports, and global frameworks. Yet long before it became a buzzword, Pacific peoples lived resilience daily. It was never about checklists or metrics, but rather how people care for one another, how relationships hold them through uncertainty, and how faith, family and culture provide a map for recovery. In Samoa and across Oceania, resilience is relational, grounded in fa’asinomaga - identity formed through kinship, village responsibilities, land and faith (Alefaio-Tugia, 2022). It is enacted through collective care in times of crisis and in shared obligations that hold communities during uncertainty. This lens complements hazard and psychological framings by foregrounding relationships as the foundation for recovery (Rumbach & Foley, 2014; Paton & Johnston, 2001).

International frameworks often define resilience as the capacity to prepare, absorb, recover, and adapt after extreme shocks (Aldunce, Berlin et al, 2015). Useful, but incomplete. Hazards scholars operationalize this via indicators such as the BRIC index, while psychologists emphasize navigating to psychological, social, cultural, and physical resources in culturally meaningful ways (Cutter et al., 2014; Camacho, Bower, Webb, & Munford, 2023, Paton & Johnston, 2017). A Pacific‑Indigenous view completes rather than replaces these lenses by centering obligations of kinship and church‑village leadership that coordinate care without delay (Alefaio‑Tugia, 2021; Rumbach & Foley, 2014).

Diaspora as First Responders: Tama Fanau

One of the most powerful and least recognized sources of Pacific resilience is the global diaspora. In Samoan contexts, Tama Fanau a Samoan term of endearment refers to children of diaspora across Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, the United States and beyond (Alefaio-Tugia, Afeaki-Mafile’o, & Satele, 2019). During disasters, Tama Fanau function as conduits, facilitators, bridge‑builders, and buffers. They share urgent information, mobilize church and village networks, navigate institutions, and deliver immediate financial and psychosocial support. Pacific-Indigenous approaches to disaster resilience offer lessons relevant to communities across the global village.

Firstly, resilience is relational, not individual. It grows through networks of care, reciprocity, and shared responsibility - not just preparedness kits and infrastructure. Diaspora communities are powerful resilience assets - Governments and agencies often overlook diaspora networks, yet they are some of the fastest and most culturally grounded responders in times of crisis. Multiple knowledge systems strengthen, not weaken resilience. Indigenous knowledge does not need validation from Western science to be legitimate. Instead, both systems can complement each other, creating richer and more effective solutions. Most importantly disaster resilience is cultural - policies that ignore local traditions, values, and community dynamics miss crucial aspects of how people survive and recover. Evidence shows remittances surge after events like the 2009 Samoa tsunami and can arrive faster, more flexibly, and for longer than formal aid, while high transfer costs and financial precarity constrain diaspora capacity (Alefaio, 2020; Pairama & Le Dé, 2018). These transnational responses are not external charity; they are inherited responsibilities enacted across oceans. Recognizing and resourcing diaspora responses is therefore a pragmatic, equity‑driven resilience strategy to support the communities who already act as first responders and sustain long‑term recovery (Alefaio‑Tugia, 2021; Pairama & Le Dé, 2018).

Small Islands, Vast Knowledge: From the SAMOA Pathway to Practice

Long before climate models and satellite images, Pacific peoples practiced sophisticated environmental science. They read the tides, stars, winds, plant movements, and animal behaviour to anticipate and cope with extremes (Hemi et al., 2023). This Indigenous and local knowledge (IK/LK) is increasingly recognized in international guidance and scholarship as foundational to effective, place‑based resilience (UNDRR, 2022; Nunn et al., 2024).

Leading up to the adoption of the UNSDGs in 2015, the 2014 UN SIDS Conference in Apia, Samoa, endorsed the SAMOA Pathway’s call for resilience building and strengthened partnerships; however, Indigenous and local knowledge remained insufficiently reflected in policy and practice. A parallel event featuring Samoa’s Head of State, Tui Atua Tupua Tamasese Efi, gathered village leaders, researchers, and government representatives together to articulate the significance of Indigenous knowledge in disaster risk reduction. Although Samoa hosted UN SIDS, global processes overlooked its centrality.

UN SIDS Parallel event panellists led by Samoa’s Head of State

The forum reaffirmed Indigenous knowledge as a complete environmental system, emphasised the coexistence of multiple knowledge traditions, and highlighted the need for policy flexibility to incorporate Indigenous worldviews. It also laid the groundwork for a regional workshop that brought together Pacific-Indigenous emergency managers to embed Indigenous knowledge in national disaster plans. This contributes to a broader shift that positions Pacific peoples as innovators, knowledge holders, and leaders in global resilience thinking.

Policy Directions: Building Relational Resilience

Looking forward, as climate change accelerates - Pacific peoples continue to demonstrate strength grounded in identity, kinship, and collective responsibility. Their experiences reveal that resilience is not simply a technical capacity - it is a lived legacy of faith, family and culture that connects generations and communities across the vast expanse of Moananuiākea (Pacific Ocean). By embracing Indigenous knowledge and supporting diaspora leadership, Pacific nations are offering the world a model of resilience that is not only effective but profoundly human. Indigenous institutions across the Pacific shape emergency authority, communication, and social mobilisation, capacities shown to be life saving during the 2009 American Samoa tsunami (Rumbach & Foley, 2014). While genuine knowledge co creation enables Indigenous and local knowledge to strengthen scientific approaches by improving early warning, resource security, and culturally grounded recovery (UNDRR, 2022; Nunn et al., 2024).

Building relational resilience suggests four practical shifts.

First, formally include diaspora leadership in national and local disaster and climate policies, with mechanisms to activate, coordinate, and fund transnational response - alongside measures to reduce remittance costs that impede rapid support (Alefaio, 2020; Pairama & Le Dé, 2018).

Second, institutionalize knowledge partnerships that treat IK/LK as a complete and valid system, with safeguards for community ownership and benefit (UNDRR, 2022; Nunn et al., 2024).

Third, invest in church‑village infrastructures as culturally trusted hubs for preparedness, logistics, and psychosocial care (Alefaio‑Tugia, 2021; Rumbach & Foley, 2014).

Fourth, adopt resilience metrics that capture social capital, community capacity, and culturally meaningful recovery, not only hard infrastructure (Cutter et al., 2014; Paton & Johnston, 2017). Amid accelerating climate disruption, Pacific nations and their global diaspora continue to demonstrate resilience grounded in identity, kinship, and faith. When policy frameworks actively embrace Indigenous knowledge and enable diaspora leadership, resilience planning becomes both more effective and human centered.

These approaches do not replace scientific models, they complete it - offering culturally grounded pathways that can strengthen disaster risk reduction across our global village (UNDRR, 2022; Nunn et al., 2024).

References

Aldunce, P., Beilin, R., Howden, M., & Handmer, J. (2015). Resilience for disaster risk management in a changing climate: Practitioners’ frames and practices. Global Environmental Change, 30, 1–11.

Alefaio Tugia, S. (2022). Pacific Indigenous psychology: Galuola, a NIU wave of psychological practices (1st ed.). Springer.

Alefaio, S. (2020, September 4). Mobilizing the Pacific diaspora: A key component of disaster resilience. East-West Wire. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26406

Alefaio-Tugia, S. (2021). Beyond aid: Sustainable disaster resilience through an urbanized Pacific diaspora. Journal of International Affairs, 74(1). https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/content/beyond-aid-sustainable-disaster-resilience-through-urbanized-pacific-diaspora

Alefaio-Tugia, S., Afeaki-Mafile’o, E., & Satele, P. (2019). Pacific-Indigenous community–village resilience in disasters. In Pacific Social Work (Chapter 7). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315144252-7

Camacho, C., Bower, P., Webb, R. T., & Munford, L. (2023). Measurement of community resilience using the Baseline Resilience Indicator for Communities (BRIC) framework: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 103870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103870

Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. (2014). The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change, 29, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005

Hemi, K., Alefaio Tugia, S., Dumaru, P., Plange, N., Steven, H., & Williams, S. (2023). ‘We are the Moana’: Climate risks, narratives of vulnerability and Indigenous Pacific resilience (Chapter 5). In Pacific Ocean Climate Crisis Assessment (POCCA). University of Canterbury. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstreams/602a79f8-15bf-45e1-91be-503659492360/download

Nunn, P. D., Kumar, R., Barrowman, H. M., Chambers, L., Fifita, L., Gegeo, D., Gomese, C., McGree, S., Rarai, A., Cheer, K., Esau, D., Fa’anunu, ‘O., Fong, T., Fong-Lomavatu, M., Geraghty, P., Heorake, T., Kekeubata, E., Korovulavula, I., Kubunavanua, E., … Waiwai, M. (2024). Traditional knowledge for climate resilience in the Pacific Islands. WIREs Climate Change, e882. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.882

Pairama, J., & Le Dé, L. (2018). Remittances for disaster risk management: Perspectives from Pacific Island migrants living in New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0183-8

Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2001). Disasters and communities: Vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management, 10(4), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005930

Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (Eds.). (2017). Disaster resilience: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). Charles C Thomas.

Rumbach, A., & Foley, D. (2014). Indigenous institutions and their role in disaster risk reduction and resilience: Evidence from the 2009 tsunami in American Samoa. Ecology and Society, 19(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06189-190119

United Nations. (2014, September 4). Reaffirming commitment to small island developing States, global leaders adopt historic text in Samoa pledging action on sustainable development (Press release DEV/3112). https://press.un.org/en/2014/dev3112.doc.htm

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2022). Using traditional and indigenous knowledges for disaster risk reduction: Words into Action. https://www.undrr.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/11_Traditional%20Knowledges_2022_2.pdf